Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
M. FUND, INC., appellant, v. Selwyn CARTER, defendant-respondent; K & G Developers of N.Y., Inc., intervenor-respondent.
In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated June 2, 2005, as granted the motion of K & G Developers of N.Y., Inc., for leave to reargue, and upon reargument, vacated its prior order dated April 12, 2005, denying the motion of K & G Developers of N.Y., Inc. for leave to intervene and, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) to dismiss the complaint and granting its cross motion for summary judgment, and granted the motion and denied the cross motion.
ORDERED that the order dated June 2, 2005, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the intervenor, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a determination of whether the intervenor sustained a loss and, if so, the extent of the loss due to the plaintiff's conduct during the period that the injunction was in effect pursuant to the decision and order on motion of this court dated July 15, 2005.
The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of nonparty K & G Developers of N.Y., Inc. (hereinafter K & G), for leave to reargue and, upon reargument, inter alia, granted that branch of its motion which was, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) to dismiss the complaint. “To succeed on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the documentary evidence that forms the basis of the defense must be such that it resolves all factual issues as a matter of law, and conclusively disposes of the plaintiff's claim” (Trade Source v. Westchester Wood Works, 290 A.D.2d 437, 438, 736 N.Y.S.2d 605; see Berardino v. Ochlan, 2 A.D.3d 556, 770 N.Y.S.2d 75; Prudential Wykagyl/Rittenberg Realty v. Calabria-Maher, 1 A.D.3d 422, 766 N.Y.S.2d 885). The documentary evidence submitted by K & G to demonstrate that its deed was recorded first conclusively established that defense as a matter of law (see Varon v. Annino, 170 A.D.2d 445, 565 N.Y.S.2d 540).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 18, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)