Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Timothy P. O'DEA, et al., Petitioners-Respondents, v. Robert A. BELL, Appellant, et al., Respondents.
In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating Robert A. Bell as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 9, 1997, for the nomination of the Republican Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the City Council of the City of New York for the 39th Council District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), entered August 14, 1997, which granted the application.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the application is denied, the proceeding is dismissed, and the Board of Elections of the City of New York is directed to restore the name of Robert A. Bell to the appropriate ballot.
The Supreme Court erred in invalidating all of the signatures witnessed by a certain Commissioner of Deeds. The testimony adduced at trial supported the finding that the Commissioner failed to take the oath of three of the 146 signatories. These three signatures were properly invalidated (see, Matter of Boyle v. New York City Bd. of Elections, 185 A.D.2d 953, 587 N.Y.S.2d 23; Matter of Zunno v. Fein, 175 A.D.2d 935, 936, 573 N.Y.S.2d 527). However, no evidence was presented which would rebut the strong presumption of regularity that a public officer has performed the duty imposed upon him by law with respect to the remaining 143 signatures (see, Matter of Rodriguez v. Harris, 51 N.Y.2d 737, 738, 432 N.Y.S.2d 358, 411 N.E.2d 777; Matter of Caruso v. Casciola, 27 N.Y.2d 657, 658, 313 N.Y.S.2d 871, 261 N.E.2d 907; Matter of Frazier v. Leon, 186 A.D.2d 99, 100, 587 N.Y.S.2d 45).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)