Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Lavell BARRETT, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia Jr., J.), entered October 28, 1996 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner parole release.
Petitioner is serving a prison term of 3 to 9 years following his 1995 conviction of the crime of manslaughter in the second degree. Petitioner challenges the denial of his application for parole release. Such decisions are, however, discretionary and will not be disturbed so long as they satisfy the statutory requirements (see, Executive Law § 259-i; see also, Matter of Walker v. New York State Div. of Parole, 203 A.D.2d 757, 610 N.Y.S.2d 397) and there is no showing of either error or “irrationality bordering on impropriety” (Matter of Russo v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 N.Y.2d 69, 77, 427 N.Y.S.2d 982, 405 N.E.2d 225). Our review of the record discloses that these requirements were met by respondent's consideration of petitioner's application. A special emphasis was placed upon the heinous nature of petitioner's crime, i.e., the gratuitous fatal shooting of a man he had just robbed, as well as upon petitioner's failure to accept responsibility for this crime. Also noted was the relatively brief period of time that had been spent by petitioner in the State correctional system, giving him insufficient time to participate fully in its rehabilitative and therapeutic programs. We conclude that the petition was correctly dismissed.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 04, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)