Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Cynthia L. DAWSON, Appellant. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 16, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant worked as an associate medical records specialist for a hospital in New York City. In July or August 2003, claimant's husband and family relocated to North Carolina after her husband's company moved there. Claimant stayed in New York City until July 2004 at which time she resigned from her position and moved to North Carolina. After leaving her job, claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits in New York. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified her from receiving benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. This appeal ensued.
We affirm. “A brief delay in resigning from one's employment in order to join a relocating spouse might not disqualify a claimant from receiving benefits, provided that the resignation was intended at the time the spouse relocated ․ and ․ the length of the delay ‘was reasonable under the circumstances' ” (Matter of Edkin [Commissioner of Labor], 263 A.D.2d 758, 759, 692 N.Y.S.2d 849 [1999], quoting Matter of Stuber [M. Shanken Communications-Commissioner of Labor], 253 A.D.2d 972, 677 N.Y.S.2d 824 [1998] [citation omitted] ). In the instant case, claimant waited an entire year to join her husband and family in North Carolina. She stayed behind to increase her years of service and avoid a reduction of her pension benefits. Under these circumstances, we find that the Board could properly conclude that the lengthy delay was unreasonable and claimant did not have good cause for leaving her employment (see Matter of Glendinning [Commissioner of Labor], 260 A.D.2d 828, 828-829, 688 N.Y.S.2d 771 [1999]; Matter of Leon-Ghadamabadi [Commissioner of Labor], 258 A.D.2d 797, 797-798, 685 N.Y.S.2d 870 [1999] ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 29, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)