Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Michael P. McDERMOTT, petitioner, v. TOWN BOARD OF the TOWN OF PATTERSON, et al., respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of the Town of Patterson, dated July 9, 2003, which adopted the recommendation and findings of a hearing officer, finding the petitioner guilty of misconduct, and terminated his employment with the Town of Patterson Highway Department.
ADJUDGED that the petition is granted to the extent that so much of the determination as imposed a penalty is annulled, without costs or disbursements, the matter is remitted to the Town Board of the Town of Patterson to impose an appropriate penalty less severe than termination of the petitioner's employment, and the petition is otherwise denied, the proceeding is otherwise dismissed, and the determination is otherwise confirmed.
The determination that the petitioner was guilty of misconduct was supported by substantial evidence in the record (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183). However, under all of the circumstances, the penalty of dismissal was so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321; Matter of Rapkiewicz v. Middle Country School Dist., 273 A.D.2d 392, 393, 711 N.Y.S.2d 326). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Town Board of the Town of Patterson for the imposition of a penalty less severe than termination of the petitioner's employment.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 14, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)