Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Patrick BERRY, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), rendered August 20, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, illegal possession of a vehicle identification number, and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that the trial court improvidently exercised its discretion by failing to impose sanctions for the People's failure to preserve a license plate that was attached to the stolen van at the time of his arrest, is raised for the first time on appeal, and therefore, is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Buckley, 75 N.Y.2d 843, 846, 552 N.Y.S.2d 912, 552 N.E.2d 160; People v. Edwards, 179 A.D.2d 511, 513-514, 579 N.Y.S.2d 344).
In any event, the defendant's claim is without merit. The evidence adduced at trial established that after the defendant's arrest, the van and the license plate attached thereto, were transported to the 110th Police Precinct, where the license plate was vouchered and photographed. However, sometime thereafter, an unknown thief stole the van along with the license plate. Although the actual license plate was not available at trial, the defendant stipulated to the admission into evidence of the photograph and had the opportunity to cross-examine the People's witnesses as to it. Since, under these circumstances, there is no evidence of bad faith by the People and no showing of prejudice to the defendant, the trial court was not required to impose sanctions (see, People v. Haupt, 71 N.Y.2d 929, 528 N.Y.S.2d 808, 524 N.E.2d 129; People v. Sunset Bay, 67 N.Y.2d 787, 501 N.Y.S.2d 19, 492 N.E.2d 127; People v. Kelly, 62 N.Y.2d 516, 478 N.Y.S.2d 834, 467 N.E.2d 498; People v. Perez, 255 A.D.2d 403, 681 N.Y.S.2d 550; People v. Lulenski, 193 A.D.2d 817, 818, 598 N.Y.S.2d 289; People v. Daly, 186 A.D.2d 217, 587 N.Y.S.2d 747; People v. McIntosh, 184 A.D.2d 662, 587 N.Y.S.2d 165).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 12, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)