Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: McDONALD'S CORPORATION, respondent, v. Roy M. KERN, etc., et al., appellants.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Smithtown, which denied the petitioner's application for a special exception use permit, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated April 8, 1998, which granted the petition, annulled the determination, and directed that the application be granted upon certain stated conditions. The judgment brings up for review an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated September 26, 1996, which reversed and annulled a prior determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Smithtown on the same application, and remitted the matter for further proceedings.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the Board of Zoning Appeals exceeded its authority when it sua sponte raised the issue of the location of the relevant zoning district boundary lines and, upon its own inquiry, rendered essentially a de novo determination on that issue (see, Moriarty v. Planning Bd. of Vil. of Sloatsburg, 119 A.D.2d 188, 506 N.Y.S.2d 184; Barron v. Getnick, 107 A.D.2d 1017, 486 N.Y.S.2d 528; Matter of Carlington Corp. v. Siegel, 61 A.D.2d 813, 402 N.Y.S.2d 46). Accordingly, the special exception use permit should be granted to the petitioner, provided the petitioner otherwise satisfies the conditions stated.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 19, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)