Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Paul P. BOCCONE, appellant, v. ISLAND FEDERAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., respondents.
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated June 10, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the complaint and to dismiss the defendants' counterclaim to recover damages for injury to property, and granted the cross motion of the defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against the defendant Steven Baritz.
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the defendants' counterclaim as time-barred, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendants' counterclaim to recover damages for injury to property was first interposed in an answer served in January 1997, over three years after the cause of action accrued. The counterclaim did not relate to the same transactions or occurrences referred to in the original complaint or the original answer. Accordingly, the counterclaim is time-barred (see, CPLR 203 [f]; Hellman v. Hoenig & Co., 244 A.D.2d 529, 665 N.Y.S.2d 581).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit (see, Holzer Assocs. v. Orta, 250 A.D.2d 737, 672 N.Y.S.2d 915; Fischer v. Weiland, 241 A.D.2d 439, 661 N.Y.S.2d 516; American Media Concepts v. Atkins Pictures, 179 A.D.2d 446, 578 N.Y.S.2d 193; Diplacidi v. Gruder, 135 A.D.2d 395, 396, 522 N.Y.S.2d 1).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 03, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)