Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Joseph DeMASI, et al., respondents, v. RADBRO REALTY, defendant, Myson Properties Company, et al., appellants (and a third-party action).
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Myson Properties Company and Yorkshire Food Sales Company appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated March 20, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellants is dismissed.
The plaintiff Joseph DeMasi allegedly sustained injuries when he fell at his workplace at 8:45 A.M. on January 27, 1992. According to DeMasi's own deposition testimony, it had snowed “the night before into the 27th” and there were still “snow flurries” at the time of the accident.
On the question of liability for an accumulation of snow and ice, this court has repeatedly held:
“a property owner may not be held liable unless he or she has notice of the defect, or, in the exercise of due care, should have had notice, and the owner has had a reasonably sufficient time from the end of the storm to remedy the condition caused by the elements” (Arcuri v. Vitolo, 196 A.D.2d 519, 520, 601 N.Y.S.2d 173; see, Wall v. Village of Mineola, 237 A.D.2d 511, 512, 656 N.Y.S.2d 883).
The appellants, as movants, bore the initial burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Kyung Sook Park v. Caesar Chemists, 245 A.D.2d 425, 666 N.Y.S.2d 679). The appellants satisfied that burden with evidence of the injured plaintiff's own observations. The plaintiffs, in opposition, submitted no evidence in admissible form to rebut the injured plaintiff's own testimony (see, Sagges v. Long Is. R.R., 259 A.D.2d 537, 686 N.Y.S.2d 467; Whitt v. St. John's Episcopal Hosp., 258 A.D.2d 648, 685 N.Y.S.2d 789). The plaintiffs failed to establish that there are issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment to the appellants (see, Sagges v. Long Is. R.R., supra). Accordingly, summary judgment is granted, and the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellants is dismissed.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 03, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)