Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Karlene GORDON, appellant, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, et al., respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeRiggi, J.), dated March 19, 1998, which, upon the granting of the defendants' motion, made at the close of the plaintiff's case, for judgment as a matter of law, dismissed the complaint.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, the complaint is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a new trial, with costs to abide the event.
This action arose from a collision between a police vehicle driven by Officer Gordon Thorne and a car driven by the plaintiff. The trial court correctly concluded, as a matter of law, that Officer Thorne was engaged in an emergency operation as defined by statute when the accident occurred (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 114-b). As such, the defendants may not be held liable unless Officer Thorne's conduct demonstrated a reckless disregard for the safety of others (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104(e); Saarinen v. Kerr, 84 N.Y.2d 494, 620 N.Y.S.2d 297, 644 N.E.2d 988).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and affording her every favorable inference to be drawn therefrom (see, Szczerbiak v. Pilat, 90 N.Y.2d 553, 664 N.Y.S.2d 252, 686 N.E.2d 1346), under the circumstances presented, the defendants were not entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of recklessness. The evidence indicated that Officer Thorne heard a broadcast over the police radio that a fellow officer and an ambulance had both been dispatched to a medical emergency at a nearby church. Since he was in the vicinity, Officer Thorne commenced traveling at a high rate of speed down the center turning lane of a main thoroughfare heavily congested with traffic. Officer Thorne did not engage his emergency siren before colliding with the plaintiff's car, and although he was approaching a red light, he did not attempt to decelerate. Based upon the evidence, a rational juror could conclude that Officer Thorne acted with reckless disregard for the safety of others (see, Campbell v. City of Elmira, 84 N.Y.2d 505, 620 N.Y.S.2d 302, 644 N.E.2d 993), and the trial court erred in granting the defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 03, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)