Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. James A. CARTER, Appellant, v. David MILLER, as Warden of the State Prison at Eastern Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Donohue, J.), entered April 10, 1998 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
Petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding contending, inter alia, that he was denied due process because the original felony complaint was not dismissed before he was tried on the indictment, he was denied the right to testify before the Grand Jury and the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment of conviction. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm.
Because petitioner's claims were or could have been raised in his direct appeal or in his CPL article 440 motions, habeas corpus relief is unavailable in this case (see, People ex rel. Moore v. Miller, 244 A.D.2d 735, 664 N.Y.S.2d 388, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 808, 669 N.Y.S.2d 261, 692 N.E.2d 130). Furthermore, we find no extraordinary circumstances to warrant a departure from traditional orderly procedure. In any event, even if the issues raised by petitioner were meritorious, habeas corpus relief would be inappropriate inasmuch as he would not be entitled to immediate release (see generally, People ex rel. Merriweather v. Miller, 243 A.D.2d 872, 662 N.Y.S.2d 939, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 804, 668 N.Y.S.2d 559, 691 N.E.2d 631).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 06, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)