Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Michael O'BRIEN, appellant, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al., respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated March 10, 1997, which, after a fair hearing, affirmed a determination of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services, dated August 9, 1996, denying the petitioner's application for public assistance benefits on the ground that the petitioner failed to participate in a licensed rehabilitation program for alcoholism and substance dependence, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), entered January 16, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. The appellant's notice of appeal from the decision dated October 31, 1997, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520[c] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly found that 18 NYCRR 370-2(d)(7)(ii), which was in effect at the time the determination was made, did not violate the petitioner's first amendment right to the free exercise of religion, as “[a] generally applicable and otherwise valid enactment, which is not intended to regulate religious conduct or beliefs but which may incidentally burden the free exercise of religion, is not deemed to violate the First Amendment” (McGann v. Incorporated Village of Old Westbury, 256 A.D.2d 556, 682 N.Y.S.2d 433; see also, New York State Empl. Relations Bd. v. Christ the King High School, 90 N.Y.2d 244, 660 N.Y.S.2d 359, 682 N.E.2d 960).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 10, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)