Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
405 44TH STREET REALTY CO., plaintiff-respondent, v. 168 FORTUNE REALTY, INC., et al., defendants, Naftoli Weber, nonparty-appellant; Sunset Gardens Housing Corporation, intervenor-respondent.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, nonparty Naftoli Weber, an unsuccessful bidder at a foreclosure sale, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated April 1, 2003, which denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate an order of the same court dated August 1, 2002, directing that the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to certain terms of sale, and to set aside the foreclosure sale, and granted the plaintiff's cross motion to confirm the referee's report of sale. Motion by the intervenor Sunset Gardens Housing Corporation, inter alia, to dismiss the appeal as academic. By decision and order on motion of this court dated September 9, 2004, that branch of the motion which was to dismiss the appeal as academic was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is,
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The subject property was sold to the intervenor, a good-faith purchaser for value, during the pendency of the appeal. Since any determination by this court will not affect the rights of the parties and the matter does not otherwise warrant invoking an exception to the mootness doctrine, the appeal is academic (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876; NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v. Equitable Funding Corp., 301 A.D.2d 506, 752 N.Y.S.2d 900).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 10, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)