Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Milton ARNOLD, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
After an investigation indicated that petitioner slashed another inmate's face, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assault and violent conduct. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty of both charges. That determination was administratively affirmed, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.
We confirm. Respondent's determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record, including the misbehavior report and confidential testimony and information (see Matter of Gallo v. Fischer, 50 A.D.3d 1374, 1374, 854 N.Y.S.2d 829 [2008] ). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed such that petitioner had notice of the charges against him and was able to prepare a defense (see Matter of Nova v. Selsky, 54 A.D.3d 453, 454, 863 N.Y.S.2d 296 [2008] ). Petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer was biased is neither substantiated by the record nor is there any indication that the determination of guilt flowed from any purported bias (see Matter of Randolph v. Napoli, 56 A.D.3d 832, 833, 866 N.Y.S.2d 460 [2008] ).
We have examined petitioner's remaining arguments, including his claim that the Hearing Officer failed to appropriately assess the credibility of the confidential information, and find them to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 12, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)