Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Phyllis CAMPANARO, respondent, v. ARIZONA LIPNOB ESTATES, INC., defendant, Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, d/b/a Food Emporium, appellant.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, d/b/a Food Emporium, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered July 2, 1998, which denied the motion of the defendants Arizona Lipnob Estates, Inc., and Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, d/b/a Food Emporium, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Arizona Lipnob Estates, Inc., is dismissed, as the appellant is not aggrieved thereby; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as reviewed, on the law, that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, d/b/a Food Emporium, is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against that defendant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs.
Since the record establishes that the allegedly defective condition over which the plaintiff tripped and fell was readily observable by a reasonable use of one's senses, the appellant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Moran v. County of Dutchess, 237 A.D.2d 266, 655 N.Y.S.2d 411; Perez v. New York City Indus. Dev. Agency, 223 A.D.2d 628, 636 N.Y.S.2d 851; Zaffiris v. O'Loughlin, 184 A.D.2d 696, 585 N.Y.S.2d 94).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 15, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)