Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., respondent, v. Gerald D. DENNIS, appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 for a permanent stay of arbitration of a claim pursuant to General Business Law § 198-a, and pursuant to CPLR 7510 to confirm an arbitration award, Gerald D. Dennis appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered March 16, 1998, which, upon an order of the same court, entered February 23, 1998, in favor of the respondent, granted the petition. The appellant's notice of appeal from the order entered February 23, 1998, is deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Prior to the appellant filing the request for arbitration which is the subject of this proceeding, the parties participated in an arbitration based essentially on the same purported defect in the appellant's vehicle, i.e., the braking system, in which the appellant sought the same relief against the respondent. In the absence of any new facts or evidence that the appellant was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate his claim in the prior arbitration proceeding, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the doctrine of res judicata barred the new arbitration proceeding (see, Lari v. Slanetz, 240 A.D.2d 581, 658 N.Y.S.2d 691; Casey v. Country-Wide Insurance Co., 240 A.D.2d 232, 658 N.Y.S.2d 613; Dimacopoulos v. Consort Development Corp., 158 A.D.2d 658, 552 N.Y.S.2d 124).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 15, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)