Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CHAYA S. (Anonymous), a/k/a Chaya M.A. (Anonymous), et al., appellants, v. FREDERICK HERBERT L. (Anonymous), et al., respondents.
In a proceeding, inter alia, to vacate a private placement intrafamily adoption, the appeal is from a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated July 1, 1998, which (1) denied the petition and (2) failed to comply with the prior directive of this court to decide the application of Chaya S., a/k/a Chaya M.A. for visitation by Chaya S., a/k/a Chaya M.A. with the child, based on her status as biological mother (see, Matter of Chaya S. v. Frederick Herbert L., 246 A.D.2d 658, 668 N.Y.S.2d 905).
ORDERED that the decree is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Surrogate's Court, Queens County, for a hearing to be held with all convenient speed and thereafter a determination on the merits of the application of the petitioner Chaya S., a/k/a Chaya M. A., for visitation with the child, based upon her status as biological mother; and it is further,
ORDERED that that determination shall be rendered within 45 days of the date of this decision and order.
In this proceeding, inter alia, to vacate an intrafamily adoption, the child's biological parents allege that the biological mother's judicial consent to the adoption of the now 12 year-old child by the child's maternal grandparents was fraudulently induced (see, Domestic Relations Law § 115-b [7]; Matter of Ricky AA., 146 A.D.2d 433, 541 N.Y.S.2d 264, affd. 75 N.Y.2d 885, 554 N.Y.S.2d 473, 553 N.E.2d 1021). However, the Surrogate's Court resolved credibility issues against the biological mother, and we find no basis for disturbing the Surrogate's Court's determination.
We note that the Surrogate failed to rule on the application by Chaya S., a/k/a Chaya M.A. (hereinafter Chaya S.), for visitation with the child based upon her status as biological mother, although directed to do so by this court (see, Matter of Chaya S. v. Frederick Herbert L., 246 A.D.2d 658, 668 N.Y.S.2d 905). Chaya S. has standing to seek visitation in her status as biological mother (see, Matter of Alison D. v. Virginia M., 77 N.Y.2d 651, 656, 569 N.Y.S.2d 586, 572 N.E.2d 27; Matter of Ann M.C. v Orange County Dept. of Social Servs., 250 A.D.2d 190, 682 N.Y.S.2d 62; see also, Matter of Jacob, 86 N.Y.2d 651, 665, 636 N.Y.S.2d 716, 660 N.E.2d 397), with the predominant concern being the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Ann M.C. v. Orange County Dept. of Social Servs., supra).
Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Surrogate's Court, Queens County, for a hearing on the best interests of the child to be held with all convenient speed and thereafter a determination on visitation.
The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 15, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)