Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Clement RUSSO, petitioner, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the WANTAGH UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Education of the Wantagh Union Free School District, dated June 3, 1997, which modified the recommendation of a Hearing Officer, made after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of the disciplinary charges of misconduct and incompetence concerning a smoke condition in the school at which he was employed, and terminated his employment.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The determination of the respondent Board of Education that the petitioner, an elementary school custodian, was guilty of disciplinary charges of misconduct and incompetence concerning a smoke condition in the school at which he was employed, was supported by substantial evidence on the record (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321; Matter of Bullock v. Department of Social Servs., 248 A.D.2d 380, 669 N.Y.S.2d 618). Further, under the circumstances of this case, the termination of the petitioner's employment was not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock one's sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., supra). A fire began in the custodians' area of the petitioner's school, caused by cigarettes igniting waste paper in a plastic trash pail which had not been emptied, and necessitated the evacuation of the students.
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 22, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)