Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MARINE MIDLAND BANK f/k//a Marine Midland Bank, N.A., respondent, v. Abdul RASHID, appellant.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage on two parcels of real property, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated February 27, 1998, which, upon the plaintiff's motion to fix the amount of the deficiency existing after the sale of the first parcel, inter alia, ordered a valuation hearing to aid in the determination of the motion, and (2) an order and judgment (one paper) of the same court, dated May 28, 1998, which, after the valuation hearing, fixed the amount of the deficiency existing after the sale of the first parcel and directed the sale of the second parcel.
ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed as no appeal lies as of right from an order directing a hearing to aid in the disposition of the motion (see, CPLR 5701; Bagdy v. Progresso Foods, Corp., 86 A.D.2d 589, 446 N.Y.S.2d 137), and leave has not been granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.
Since the defendant had actual notice of the plaintiff's motion, and the plaintiff substantially complied with the service requirements of RPAPL 1371(2), the trial court properly fixed the amount of the deficiency existing after the sale of the first parcel and directed the sale of the remaining parcel (see, Sarasota, Inc. v. Homestead Acres at Greenport, 249 A.D.2d 290, 670 N.Y.S.2d 878).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 29, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)