Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Tiofilo MORALES, Appellant, v. Brion D. TRAVIS, as Chairman of New York State Parole Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered September 1, 1998 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner's request for parole release.
Petitioner is currently serving a prison term of 15 years to life following his conviction of the crime of murder in the second degree. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial of his request for parole release. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm.
It is well settled that the Parole Board need not specifically address each of the guidelines in its determination (see, Matter of Waters v. New York State Div. of Parole, 252 A.D.2d 759, 760, 676 N.Y.S.2d 279, 280, lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 812, 680 N.Y.S.2d 905, 703 N.E.2d 763). While the Parole Board placed special emphasis upon the nature of the underlying crime and petitioner's failure to accept responsibility or demonstrate remorse for the crime, upon our review of the record we are satisfied that the Parole Board took into consideration other appropriate factors, including petitioner's achievements while incarcerated (see, People ex rel. Talley v. Executive Dept., N.Y. State Div. of Parole, 232 A.D.2d 798, 799, 648 N.Y.S.2d 746). Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Parole Board's discretionary decision. Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)