Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Frank FRATELLO, Petitioner, v. J. FARRELL, as Superintendent of Wallkill Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
A search of petitioner's prison cell recovered an altered electrical wire, an AM/FM radio and an “off duty permit” card signed by a facility deacon allowing petitioner to possess the radio. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of contraband, unauthorized exchange and tampering with an electrical device. A tier II disciplinary hearing ensued, during which the deacon testified that he signed the permit card authorizing petitioner to use the radio. Although the Hearing Officer noted that the deacon did not have the authority to issue permission for use of the radio, he nevertheless found petitioner not guilty of possession of contraband and unauthorized exchange. Petitioner was, however, found guilty of tampering with an electrical device. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We must annul the determination. The prison disciplinary rule that petitioner was found guilty of violating states that “[a]n inmate shall not alter, rewire, tamper or attempt to repair electrical outlets or any electrical device” (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][19][ix] ). A review of the hearing transcript fails to definitively indicate that the source or purpose of the electrical wire was ever established. Absent such proof, it cannot be concluded that petitioner actually tampered with an electrical outlet or device. Thus, the requisite substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt is lacking (see Matter of Garofolo v. Cunningham, 34 A.D.3d 1071, 1073, 825 N.Y.S.2d 562 [2006] ). Given our disposition, petitioner's contention that the misbehavior report was deficient is academic.
ADJUDGED that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted and the Commissioner of Correctional Services is directed to expunge all references to this matter from petitioner's institutional record.
LAHTINEN, J.
MERCURE, J.P., SPAIN, ROSE and KAVANAGH, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 27, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)