Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Henry WILSON, Respondent, v. ROSELLI MOVING & STORAGE CORPORATION, Appellant. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed August 18, 2005, which rescinded a decision of the Workers' Compensation Law Judge and restored the case to the trial calendar for further development of the record.
Claimant's case for compensable injuries was established and he began receiving workers' compensation benefits. He thereafter filed a discrimination complaint pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law §§ 120 alleging that he was “constructive[ly] discharged.” After several hearings were apparently scheduled and adjourned, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge denied the complaint and closed the case. The Workers' Compensation Board, however, subsequently rescinded that decision and restored the case to the trial calendar for further development of the record. The employer now appeals.
Given that the Board's decision was interlocutory and neither disposed of all substantive issues nor addressed a dispositive legal issue, the decision is not appealable (see Matter of Sawyer v. Orange Motors, 24 A.D.3d 1117, 1117, 807 N.Y.S.2d 668 [2005]; Matter of Reese v. Advanced Empl. Concepts, 15 A.D.3d 760, 761, 790 N.Y.S.2d 721 [2005] ). In addition, we note that “piecemeal review of issues in workers' compensation cases should be avoided” (Matter of Sawyer v. Orange Motors, supra at 1117-1118, 807 N.Y.S.2d 668; see Matter of Karam v. Executive Charge/Love Taxi, 284 A.D.2d 599, 599, 725 N.Y.S.2d 577 [2001] ). Thus, recognizing that this nonfinal determination is reviewable upon an appeal from the Board's final decision (see Matter of Sawyer v. Orange Motors, supra at 1118, 807 N.Y.S.2d 668; Matter of Boak v. O'Leary Funeral Home, 116 A.D.2d 827, 827, 497 N.Y.S.2d 613 [1986] ), we must dismiss this appeal.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.
ROSE, J.
CREW III, J.P., MUGGLIN, LAHTINEN and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 15, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)