IN RE: Robert SAUNDERS (2006)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

IN RE: Robert SAUNDERS, appellant, v. Mary SMITH, respondent.

Decided: March 28, 2006

ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.

Robert Saunders, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the petitioner father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Freeman, J.), dated September 17, 2004, which denied his objection to a prior order of the same court dated May 10, 2004, denying his objections to an order of the same court (Baur, S.M.) dated February 11, 2004, which fixed his child support arrears at $13,800.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that the filing of an objection to the order dated May 10, 2004, was not the proper procedure for seeking review of the Support Magistrate's order fixing the appellant's child support arrears (see Family Ct. Act § 439[e]; Matter of Davidson v. Wilner, 214 A.D.2d 563, 625 N.Y.S.2d 917).

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network