Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Corey LASHLEY, Petitioner, v. J. LINDSAY, as Deputy Superintendent of Programs, Orleans Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of soliciting another inmate's crime information, making false statements, counterfeiting and providing unauthorized legal assistance. Petitioner exhausted his administrative remedies and then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, related confidential documentation and hearing testimony constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Arpa v. David, 32 A.D.3d 1140, 1141, 821 N.Y.S.2d 495 [2006] ). With regard to the credibility of the confidential information, our review thereof satisfies us that it was sufficiently detailed and probative to permit the Hearing Officer to independently assess its reliability (see Matter of Catlin v. Gouverneur Correctional Facility, 38 A.D.3d 1025, 1026, 832 N.Y.S.2d 309 [2007] ). To the extent that petitioner offered exculpatory evidence and argued that the misbehavior report was authored in retaliation for his filing of a grievance, credibility issues were created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Rizzuto v. Goord, 36 A.D.3d 1124, 1124-1125, 826 N.Y.S.2d 852 [2007] ). Petitioner's remaining claims have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 15, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)