Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: James ADAMS, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was observed lunging at another inmate and stabbing him in the neck area. The weapon used by petitioner was recovered after he dropped it to the floor and the weapon's sheath was found in his pants pocket. Petitioner was thereafter charged in a misbehavior report with assault, possession of a weapon and fighting. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty of assault and possession of a weapon and not guilty of fighting. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner initiated this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.
We confirm. To the extent that petitioner's allegations can be construed as forming a challenge to the determination of guilt on the ground that the evidence in support thereof was insufficient, we find that the detailed misbehavior report, together with the corroborating hearing testimony from the correction officer who witnessed the incident and authored the report, provide substantial evidence to uphold the determination (see Matter of McCloud v. Selsky, 45 A.D.3d 1127, 1128, 844 N.Y.S.2d 917 [2007] ). Petitioner's claims that the misbehavior report and supporting documentation were defective and that he was denied the right to present witness testimony have been examined and found to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
SPAIN, J.P., CARPINELLO, MALONE JR., KAVANAGH and STEIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 07, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)