Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Ryan MURRAY, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered April 26, 2000, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (McBrien, J.), upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous adjudication as a youthful offender.
ORDERED that the amended judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the amended judgment is affirmed, and the case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).
Following a hearing, the Supreme Court found that the defendant was in violation of probation because he failed to notify his probation officer of his arrest. The defendant was arrested on February 19, 1999, for a homicide which occurred on July 24, 1997, several months before the date he was placed on probation, i.e., December 1, 1997. The Supreme Court specifically noted that in determining the defendant's sentence for the violation of probation it considered the facts of the homicide.
The Supreme Court improperly considered the defendant's conduct which occurred before the date he was placed on probation (see, Penal Law § 65.10; CPL 410.70; see also, People v. Hudson, 270 A.D.2d 287, 704 N.Y.S.2d 105). Accordingly, the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing.
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 02, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)