Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey L. SWARTS, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Sgueglia, J.), rendered November 21, 2008, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.
Defendant pleaded guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree in full satisfaction of a three-count indictment arising out of charges that he molested the six-year-old daughter of a woman with whom he was living. Pursuant to the negotiated plea agreement, defendant was sentenced to four years in prison followed by five years of postrelease supervision. He now appeals and we affirm.
Defendant's contentions that his plea was involuntary and factually insufficient are precluded by his failure to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v. Brady, 59 A.D.3d 748, 748, 872 N.Y.S.2d 246 [2009]; People v. Smith, 57 A.D.3d 1237, 1237, 869 N.Y.S.2d 693 [2008] ). Moreover, the narrow exception to the preservation rule is inapplicable inasmuch as defendant did not make any statement during the plea that negated an element of the crime or cast doubt on his guilt (see People v. Grant, 60 A.D.3d 1202, 1202-1203, 875 N.Y.S.2d 347 [2009] ). On the contrary, although the record does reflect defendant's initial confusion as to the exact charge to which he was pleading guilty, County Court fulfilled its duty to inquire further and defendant expressly admitted to inserting his finger into the victim's vagina (cf. People v. Bateman, 278 A.D.2d 749, 749-750, 719 N.Y.S.2d 162 [2000] ). Indeed, a review of the plea allocution reveals that County Court fully apprised defendant of the ramifications associated with pleading guilty and indicates that such plea was entered voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently (see People v. Demontigny, 60 A.D.3d 1152, 1153, 874 N.Y.S.2d 636 [2009] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
KAVANAGH, J.
PETERS, J.P., SPAIN, LAHTINEN and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 02, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)