Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Edward BAILEY, Petitioner, v. John BURGE, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
A search of petitioner's prison cell discovered two wires running along the floor which were concealed by some form of glue and paint. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of contraband, possession of property in an unauthorized area and misuse of state property. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and related photograph, along with the hearing testimony from the correction officer who issued the report (see Matter of Ford v. Smith, 23 A.D.3d 874, 875, 803 N.Y.S.2d 821 [2005], lv. denied 6 N.Y.3d 708, 813 N.Y.S.2d 44, 846 N.E.2d 475 [2006] ). Petitioner's assertion that he did not possess the subject wires created a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Rivera v. Selsky, 43 A.D.3d 1210, 1210, 841 N.Y.S.2d 412 [2007] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim that he was deprived of an impartial hearing, are unpreserved for our review (see Matter of Hamilton v. Goord, 32 A.D.3d 642, 643, 819 N.Y.S.2d 624 [2006], lv. denied 7 N.Y.3d 715, 826 N.Y.S.2d 181, 859 N.E.2d 921 [2006] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 07, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)