Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Mahmond JONES, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
After a search of petitioner's prison cell recovered substances which were subsequently proven to be heroin and marihuana, he was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting drug possession. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty as charged. That determination was administratively affirmed, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.
We confirm. The determination of guilt was supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report, related documentary evidence and photographs, positive drug test results and hearing testimony (see Matter of Callender v. Selsky, 41 A.D.3d 1065, 1065-1066, 837 N.Y.S.2d 793 [2007] ). Petitioner's denial that the drugs belonged to him and his claim of inconsistencies in the documentary evidence created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Diaz v. Goord, 26 A.D.3d 561, 562, 807 N.Y.S.2d 730 [2006] ). To the extent preserved, petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that there was a defective chain of custody and the Hearing Officer was biased, have been examined and found to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 24, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)