Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MICHAEL WILLIAM O. (Anonymous), a/k/a Michael O. (Anonymous). St. Christopher-Ottilie, Inc., respondent; Denise T. (Anonymous), appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper) of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J.), dated November 21, 2003, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, upon her default in appearing at the fact-finding hearing, and upon denying her motion to vacate her default, terminated her parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and the petitioner for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
An appellant seeking to vacate a default must establish a reasonable excuse for the default, as well as a meritorious defense to the proceeding (see CPLR 5015[a][1]; Matter of Jessica Dee D., 6 A.D.3d 435, 774 N.Y.S.2d 384). The mother failed to show that she had a meritorious defense to the proceeding (see Matter of Devon Dupree F., 298 A.D.2d 103, 747 N.Y.S.2d 501; Matter of Tiffany L., 294 A.D.2d 365, 746 N.Y.S.2d 389; Matter of Kevin Donnell E., 288 A.D.2d 39, 732 N.Y.S.2d 404; Matter of Edward Tyrell B., 208 A.D.2d 434, 617 N.Y.S.2d 459), and therefore, the Family Court properly denied her motion to vacate her default.
Furthermore, under the circumstances, the Family Court properly terminated the mother's parental rights (see Matter of Avery Curtis Foster Joe D., 306 A.D.2d 276, 761 N.Y.S.2d 672; Matter of Juanita F., 291 A.D.2d 496, 740 N.Y.S.2d 343).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 14, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)