Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Eddie RIVERA, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating various prison disciplinary rules after a strip search resulted in the discovery of a two-inch razor weapon. Petitioner pleaded guilty to interference, refusing a direct order and refusing frisk procedures and, after a tier III hearing, was found guilty of possessing a weapon. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeals, prompting this proceeding.
Petitioner's plea of guilty precludes him from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence as to those charges to which he pleaded guilty (see Matter of Spencer v. Goord, 38 A.D.3d 1028, 1028, 833 N.Y.S.2d 255 [2007], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 802, 840 N.Y.S.2d 567, 872 N.E.2d 253 [2007]; Matter of Caraway v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 962, 963, 823 N.Y.S.2d 309 [2006] ). As to the remaining possession of a weapon charge, the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it, together with the related documentation and videotape of the incident, provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Abdullah v. Selsky, 45 A.D.3d 1072, 1073, 846 N.Y.S.2d 421 [2007]; Matter of Roye v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 1134, 824 N.Y.S.2d 491 [2006] ). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the Hearing Officer was not required to independently assess the credibility of the confidential information that may have prompted the search because such information was not relied upon as the basis for the determination of guilt (see Matter of Wan v. Goord, 32 A.D.3d 1122, 1123, 821 N.Y.S.2d 489 [2006]; Matter of Rolon v. Goord, 30 A.D.3d 946, 948, 819 N.Y.S.2d 119 [2006] ).
Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and determined to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 24, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)