Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Sandra FELDMAN, etc., et al., appellants, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York which terminated the New York City teaching licenses of Jennifer Jones, Brenda Parsons-English, Jose Dunker, and Karen Jacoby-Raglievich, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated December 5, 1997, which dismissed the petition.
ORDERED that the appeal of Jose Dunker is dismissed as withdrawn; and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
CPLR 217 provides that “a proceeding against a body or officer must be commenced within four months after the determination to be reviewed becomes final and binding upon the petitioner”. A determination is considered final and binding for CPLR 217 purposes when it has an impact upon the petitioner and when he knows he is aggrieved (see, Matter of Metropolitan Package Store Assn. v. Duffy, 143 A.D.2d 832, 533 N.Y.S.2d 124). On this record, so much of the petition as is asserted on behalf of Jennifer Jones was time-barred (see, Matter of Clark v. Suffolk County Dept. of Civ. Serv., 216 A.D.2d 464, 628 N.Y.S.2d 377).
Contrary to the petitioners' arguments, the respondents' action in terminating the teaching licenses of the petitioners Brenda Parsons-English and Karen Jacoby-Raglievich was not arbitrary and capricious, since they admittedly failed to achieve a passing grade on the National Teacher's Examination within five years of the issuance of their licenses (see, Matter of Kudler v. Board of Educ., 236 A.D.2d 403, 654 N.Y.S.2d 579).
The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 22, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)