Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Steven A. PETRUCCO, Petitioner, v. Wayne BARKLEY, as Superintendent of Riverview Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from providing unauthorized legal assistance and unauthorized exchange of personally owned articles. The charges stemmed from petitioner's possession of another inmate's appeal papers of a disciplinary determination. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination of his guilt.
Contrary to petitioner's contention, we find substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt on both charges. In addition to seeing petitioner hand another inmate some unknown papers, the correction officer who authored the misbehavior report testified that petitioner was subsequently observed removing papers from his typewriter which were discovered to belong to that other inmate. This testimony, together with the misbehavior report and petitioner's testimony at the hearing, provides substantial evidence to support the determination of his guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)