Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jeffrey COFIELD, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Roman, J.), rendered May 4, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (six counts) and criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Griffin, J.), of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. By decision and order dated April 27, 1998, this court remitted the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to hear and report on whether the police obtained a valid waiver of the defendant's right to counsel at the lineup, and the appeal was held in abeyance in the interim (see, People v. Cofield, 249 A.D.2d 559, 672 N.Y.S.2d 139). The Supreme Court has filed its report.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered, to be preceded by an independent source hearing.
After remittitur of this case for a hearing on the issue of whether the defendant waived his right to counsel at a lineup at which the defendant appeared pursuant to a court order, the Supreme Court found, and the People concede, that the defendant did not waive his right to have counsel present at the lineup. Accordingly, reversal is mandated (see, People v. Coleman, 43 N.Y.2d 222, 401 N.Y.S.2d 57, 371 N.E.2d 819), and a new trial is ordered. An independent source hearing is to precede the new trial, as the only identification witness did not testify at the Wade hearing (see, People v. Smith, 221 A.D.2d 485, 633 N.Y.S.2d 816).
In view of the foregoing, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contentions.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 05, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)