Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Eusebio SOLER, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 28, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
In April 2004, claimant visited his mother in Puerto Rico, at which time he learned that she had been diagnosed with lung cancer a year earlier. Shortly after returning to his job at a printing company, claimant decided to relocate to Puerto Rico in order to care for his ailing mother. Claimant left his employment without notifying or thereafter contacting the employer. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The record is void of any evidence that his relocation was medically necessary for the care of his mother (see Matter of Lugo [Commissioner of Labor], 294 A.D.2d 689, 741 N.Y.S.2d 611 [2002]; Matter of Carrasquillo [Commissioner of Labor], 250 A.D.2d 910, 672 N.Y.S.2d 513 [1998] ). Moreover, by neglecting to inform the employer of his departure or inquire about a leave of absence, claimant failed to take reasonable steps to protect his employment (see Matter of Nunez [Commissioner of Labor], 20 A.D.3d 848, 798 N.Y.S.2d 805 [2005]; Matter of Uemura [Commissioner of Labor], 308 A.D.2d 632, 764 N.Y.S.2d 213 [2003] ). Accordingly, the Board's decision will not be disturbed.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 08, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)