Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Patrick GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, reported to the wrong location to attend an assigned program and presented documentation authorizing his presence that apparently was signed by the program coordinator but had not been approved by the program director. It later was determined that petitioner was, in fact, not authorized to report to that location due to a prior disciplinary infraction. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating numerous prison disciplinary rules. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of being out of place and making false statements, and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
The misbehavior report, related documentation and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Dexter v. Goord, 43 A.D.3d 516, 517, 840 N.Y.S.2d 232 [2007] ). As to petitioner's procedural claims, although the hearing began more than seven days after petitioner was served with the misbehavior report as required by 7 NYCRR 251-5.1(a), a timely extension was obtained due to the Hearing Officer's unavailability, and the hearing was commenced by the date set forth in the extension (see Matter of Cepeda v. Goord, 39 A.D.3d 640, 641, 834 N.Y.S.2d 265 [2007] ). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the record does not reveal that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Moss v. Goord, 36 A.D.3d 977, 978, 825 N.Y.S.2d 843 [2007] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have either not been preserved for our review or are lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 25, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)