Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: James ADAMS, Petitioner, v. James STINSON, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges the determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from fighting and possessing weapons. In addition to the misbehavior report, testimony from two correction officers who observed the incident established that petitioner was seen fighting with another inmate and, as correction officers approached, he was observed throwing an object, later identified as a razor. The other inmate sustained a laceration to his face during the fight. This evidence, together with the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Spencer v. Goord, 245 A.D.2d 827, 666 N.Y.S.2d 327, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 811, 671 N.Y.S.2d 715, 694 N.E.2d 884). While the correction officer who observed petitioner throwing the razor failed to endorse or prepare the misbehavior report as provided in 7 NYCRR 251-3.1(b), under the circumstances presented here, any such error is harmless inasmuch as petitioner has failed to demonstrate any prejudice resulting therefrom (see, Matter of Bolling v. Coombe, 234 A.D.2d 730, 651 N.Y.S.2d 632). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his challenge to the sufficiency of the misbehavior report and claim of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 02, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)