Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Pablo RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Philip COOMBE, as Commissioner of the State of New York Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Following a hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of using a controlled substance in violation of prison disciplinary rules. The misbehavior report, the results of two urinalysis tests and the testimony of the certified ETS operator who performed these tests established that petitioner's urine tested positive for the presence of opiates, thereby providing substantial evidence to support the finding of guilt (see, Matter of Lopez v. Goord, 242 A.D.2d 816, 661 N.Y.S.2d 1026). Petitioner's defense to the charge, i.e., that he had taken the medication Zantac which caused a false-positive result, was refuted by the certified ETS operator who testified that he had ascertained from the manufacturer of the drug-testing equipment that Zantac would not cause a false-positive reading for opiates (see generally, Matter of Murphy v. Selsky, 239 A.D.2d 724, 657 N.Y.S.2d 496; Matter of Nina v. Coombe, 233 A.D.2d 658, 649 N.Y.S.2d 833). This conflict in testimony presented a credibility issue which the Hearing Officer was free to resolve against petitioner (see, Matter of Wood v. Selsky, 240 A.D.2d 876, 877, 658 N.Y.S.2d 723, 725). We also reject petitioner's claim that he was denied his conditional right to call witnesses (see, 7 NYCRR 254.5[a] ), as the record adequately establishes that the testimony of the witness he requested would have been redundant to that supplied by other witnesses (see, Matter of Greene v. Coombe, 238 A.D.2d 813, 656 N.Y.S.2d 522, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 801, 666 N.Y.S.2d 563, 689 N.E.2d 533). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 09, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)