Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ronnie COVINGTON, Petitioner, v. Phillip COOMBE, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from disobeying a direct order.1 Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination contending, inter alia, that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence.
We agree. In reaching the determination of guilt, the Hearing Officer relied solely on petitioner's testimony. A review of petitioner's testimony fails to establish that any direct order was given to him. Although the misbehavior report would have been sufficient to support the determination of guilt, an administrative determination cannot be confirmed upon grounds not invoked by the agency (see, Matter of Lopez v. Coombe, 229 A.D.2d 639, 645 N.Y.S.2d 136 n). Accordingly, given the lack of testimony that petitioner was issued a direct order, we are compelled to annul the determination. Given our conclusion, we need not address petitioner's remaining contentions.
ADJUDGED that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted and respondents are directed to expunge all references to this matter from petitioner's institutional record.
FOOTNOTES
1. Petitioner was found not guilty of creating a disturbance and interfering with an employee.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 03, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)