Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Alexander PAGAN, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing Unit, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit inmates from assaulting other inmates, possessing weapons, fighting and engaging in violent conduct after petitioner was observed participating in a melee involving numerous other inmates while wielding a shank-type weapon. The assault charge was reversed upon petitioner's administrative appeal and the penalty was reduced; the remaining charges, however, were affirmed. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the residual determination. We confirm.
Contrary to petitioner's contention, we find that the detailed misbehavior report, combined with the reporting officer's testimony as to his eyewitness observations, provide substantial evidence of his guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477). Although petitioner denied possessing a weapon or acting in an aggressive fashion, this merely raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of De La Rosa v. Portuondo, 247 A.D.2d 810, 811, 669 N.Y.S.2d 403). Finally, we note that the remaining arguments raised in petitioner's brief, including his claim of Hearing Officer bias and his challenge to the adequacy of his employee assistance, have been waived due to his failure to object at the hearing. In any event, were these contentions properly before us, we would find them to be unsupported by the record.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 03, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)