Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jason W. ANNETTE, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main Jr., J.), rendered February 17, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted sodomy in the first degree.
In full satisfaction of a five-count indictment charging him with two counts of rape in the first degree, two counts of sodomy in the first degree and one count of endangering the welfare of a child, defendant, who was 17 years old at the time of the charged crimes, pleaded guilty to a reduced charged of attempted sodomy in the first degree. County Court refused to afford defendant youthful offender status and imposed an indeterminate sentence of 31/212 to 7 years in prison. Defendant now appeals, contending that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive and that County Court abused its discretion in refusing to adjudicate him a youthful offender. Notwithstanding the guarded recommendation in favor of youthful offender treatment from both the District Attorney's office and the Probation Department, given the serious nature of the instant crime wherein defendant sexually molested a 10-year-old child who had reason to trust him, we find no abuse of discretion in County Court's refusal to grant defendant youthful offender status (see, People v. Lloyd, 249 A.D.2d 623, 670 N.Y.S.2d 814; People v. Myatt, 248 A.D.2d 68, 72, 681 N.Y.S.2d 114). Moreover, upon review of the record and the circumstances of this case, we do not find that the sentence imposed was harsh or excessive (see, id.).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 03, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)