Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lawrence PRISCO, appellant, v. JORGEN CO., INC., et al., defendants, Tennis & Sport World at Brookhaven, Inc., defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent; Robert E. Prisco, L.E.C., third-party defendant-respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated December 24, 1997, as granted the defendant third-party plaintiff's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it and denied the plaintiff's separate cross motions to amend the caption and strike the answer of the defendant third-party plaintiff.
ORDERED that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof denying the plaintiff's cross motion to amend the caption and substituting therefor a provision granting the cross motion to the extent of adding Shep Messing Soccer & Sport World, Inc., d/b/a Tennis & Sport World at Brookhaven, Inc., as a party defendant, and otherwise denying the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The trial court properly found that the defendant third-party plaintiff Tennis & Sport World at Brookhaven, Inc., complied with discovery demands (cf., Matter of Macku, 29 A.D.2d 539, 285 N.Y.S.2d 973), which production established that there were no genuine issues of fact and that this party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law (see, Di Sabato v. Soffes, 9 A.D.2d 297, 193 N.Y.S.2d 184).
Shep Messing Soccer and Sport World d/b/a Tennis & Sport World at Brookhaven, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as Shep Messing) may be added as a party defendant, as the plaintiff's claim against it relates back to the date his action was commenced against the original defendants (see, Buran v. Coupal, 87 N.Y.2d 173, 638 N.Y.S.2d 405, 661 N.E.2d 978). The claims arose out of a single occurrence. There is evidence that Shep Messing and the original defendant Tennis & Sport World at Brookhaven, Inc., are united in interest (see, Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co., 59 N.Y.2d 239, 464 N.Y.S.2d 437, 451 N.E.2d 195), and Shep Messing's designee for the service of process was served in this action (see, L & L Plumbing & Heating v. DePalo, 253 A.D.2d 517, 677 N.Y.S.2d 153).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 07, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)