PEOPLE v. RICHARDSON (1999)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kenny RICHARDSON, appellant.

Decided: June 07, 1999

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., FRED T. SANTUCCI, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO and HOWARD MILLER, JJ.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roseann B. MacKechnie and Victor Barall of counsel; Beata Sajdak-Jones on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered September 30, 1997, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim of an unreasonable delay in sentencing is not preserved for appellate review, because he never raised the issue at the time of his plea when the deferral in sentencing was discussed or at sentencing, and he never moved to vacate his plea on this ground (see, People v. Marshall, 228 A.D.2d 15, 17-18, 653 N.Y.S.2d 604; People v. Thompson, 193 A.D.2d 841, 842, 597 N.Y.S.2d 523).

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network