Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Cristos VOUZIANAS, et al., appellants, v. Michael BONASERA, et al., defendants second third-party plaintiffs-respondents, Captain's Walk of West Bayshore Homeowners Association, Inc., defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant-respondent; Joel Schneider Construction Corp., third-party defendant-respondent and second third-party defendant-respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Connell, J.), dated May 13, 1998, as denied their motion for summary judgment on the complaint, and the defendant Captain's Walk of West Bayshore Homeowners Association, Inc., appeals from the same order.
ORDERED that the appeal of the defendant Captain's Walk of West Bayshore Homeowners Association, Inc., is dismissed, as withdrawn; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that there are triable issues of fact as to whether there was a violation of Labor Law § 240(1) and, if so, whether it proximately caused the accident. Specifically, a question of fact exists as to whether the injured plaintiff's conduct in disassembling the extension ladder at issue, and in using only the top half which lacked non-skid pads, constituted an unforeseeable, independent, intervening act which was a superseding cause of the accident (see, Ossorio v. Forest Hills S. Owners, 251 A.D.2d 475, 675 N.Y.S.2d 360; Tweedy v. Roman Catholic Church of Our Lady of Victory, 232 A.D.2d 630, 648 N.Y.S.2d 685; Styer v. Vita Constr., 174 A.D.2d 662, 571 N.Y.S.2d 524).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 21, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)