Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL, a/a/o Edward Tang, appellant, v. JOAN SERVICE CORP., respondent.
In an action to recover no-fault medical payments under an insurance contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Feinman, J.), dated July 15, 2004, which denied its motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.
The Supreme Court erred in denying the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, the plaintiff made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidentiary proof that the prescribed statutory billing forms had been mailed and received, and that payment of no-fault benefits was overdue (see Insurance Law § 5106[a]; 11 NYCRR 65.15[g][3]; Mary Immaculate Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 5 A.D.3d 742, 742-743, 774 N.Y.S.2d 564; St. Luke's Roosevelt Hosp. v. American Tr. Ins. Co., 1 A.D.3d 498, 767 N.Y.S.2d 252; St. Luke's Roosevelt Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 303 A.D.2d 743, 757 N.Y.S.2d 457; New York & Presbyt. Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 295 A.D.2d 412, 743 N.Y.S.2d 733). The defendant's submissions in opposition to the motion were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether it timely issued a denial of the claim asserted by the plaintiff (see Mary Immaculate Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., supra at 743, 774 N.Y.S.2d 564; Siegel v. Terrusa, 222 A.D.2d 428, 635 N.Y.S.2d 52).
As entitlement to the no-fault benefits, as well as statutory interest and an award of an attorney's fee (see Insurance Law § 5106[a]; 11 NYCRR 65-4.6) was established, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to calculate the amounts of no-fault benefits, statutory interest, and an attorney's fee owed to the plaintiff (see Westchester Med. Ctr. v. Am. Transit Ins. Co., 17 A.D.3d 581, 583, 793 N.Y.S.2d 489).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 17, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)