Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charan SINGH, Also Known as Gurcharan Multani, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), rendered July 20, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree.
Defendant repeatedly filed applications for a driver's license which contained false information in the Queens County office of the Department of Motor Vehicles. Defendant was charged in an Albany County indictment with three counts of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree. Following denial of his motion to dismiss for lack of geographical jurisdiction, defendant, pursuant to a plea bargain agreement in full satisfaction of the indictment, entered a plea of guilty to the first count, and waived his right to appeal, except as to the issue of geographical jurisdiction. Sentenced to time served and five years of probation, defendant now appeals contending that Albany County lacked the requisite jurisdiction over the crimes charged.
We affirm. Here, during his plea allocution, defendant admitted that he offered a false instrument for filing in Queens County which was subsequently forwarded to Albany County for processing. Under these circumstances, either the county in which the false application was filed or the county to which the false application was forwarded for purposes of processing may properly prosecute defendant (see People v. Singh, 24 A.D.3d 896, 896, 804 N.Y.S.2d 703 [2005]; Matter of Sharpton v. Turner, 169 A.D.2d 947, 949, 565 N.Y.S.2d 255 [1991]; see also CPL 20.40[1] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
MUGGLIN, J.
CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, SPAIN and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 01, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)