Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Raymond DE LA ROSA, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Corrections, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from possessing unauthorized organizational material. The charge was based upon letters, written by petitioner's son, discussing petitioner's participation in the Latin Kings (a Hispanic gang) and a picture of a lion with gold crown stickers affixed to the corner which were discovered during a search of petitioner's cell. While petitioner denied being affiliated with the Latin Kings, his son's letters specifically noted petitioner's membership in the gang.
This evidence, together with the inferences to be drawn therefrom, provide substantial evidence to support the determination that the material was gang related (see, e.g., Matter of Rivera v. Coombe, 231 A.D.2d 790, 791, 647 N.Y.S.2d 128; see generally, Matter of Garcia v. Goord, 251 A.D.2d 887, 674 N.Y.S.2d 805). Petitioner's explanation for possessing the materials presented a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Devodier v. Selsky, 241 A.D.2d 737, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1017).
Furthermore, having failed to raise the issue at the hearing or on administrative appeal, petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer allegedly consulted with someone off the record before making the determination is not preserved for our review (see, Matter of Murphy v. Selsky, 239 A.D.2d 724, 725, 657 N.Y.S.2d 496). In any event, were we to consider this issue, we would find no record support for petitioner's conclusory allegation.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 15, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)