Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, respondent, v. Robert DeFELIPPIS, et al., appellants.
In an action to enforce a contractual right to a trial de novo, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), dated April 9, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants, Robert DeFelippis and Ralph DeFelippis, were injured in an automobile accident in November 1993, and were granted arbitration awards in the amounts of $17,500 and $75,000, respectively. Thereafter the plaintiff commenced this action to enforce its contractual right to a trial de novo. The defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff waived its right to a trial de novo.
Pursuant to the underinsured motorist provisions of the policy, either party had the right to a trial de novo if the arbitration award exceeded the financial responsibility limits required by New York State law. The parties proceeded in accordance with the terms of the policy which provided for arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. Accordingly, the plaintiff did not waive its right to a trial de novo (see, Allstate Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 236 A.D.2d 344, 653 N.Y.S.2d 139; Matter of McPolin v. Allstate Ins. Co., 228 A.D.2d 602, 644 N.Y.S.2d 759; Matter of Izzo v. Allstate Ins. Co., 228 A.D.2d 441, 643 N.Y.S.2d 642; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hendricks, 226 A.D.2d 527, 641 N.Y.S.2d 79).
We decline to reach the defendants' remaining contentions which are raised for the first time on appeal (see, Shelton v. Shelton, 151 A.D.2d 659, 542 N.Y.S.2d 719).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 03, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)