Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ivan WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of New York DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered July 1, 1998 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review five determinations of respondents denying petitioner's five grievances.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the denial of five separate grievances which he filed against two correction officers. The grievances essentially allege that the named correction officers were guilty of harassing the inmates in petitioner's section by, inter alia, playing cards and speaking loudly while the inmates were trying to sleep, attempting to provoke physical confrontations and making racist remarks. The correction officers denied all the allegations. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm.
Upon our review of the record, we find that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the denial of his grievances was affected by an error of law or was arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of Graziadei v. Clinton Correctional Facility, 256 A.D.2d 697, 681 N.Y.S.2d 800; Matter of Abdul-Matiyn v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., Cent. Off. Review Comm., 251 A.D.2d 769, 770, 674 N.Y.S.2d 448, appeal dismissed 92 N.Y.2d 1025, 684 N.Y.S.2d 489, 707 N.E.2d 444; Matter of Bramble v. Laguna, 245 A.D.2d 928, 666 N.Y.S.2d 51, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 810, 670 N.Y.S.2d 404, 693 N.E.2d 751). The record indicates that each of the grievances was appropriately investigated and, under the circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the determinations crediting the denials of the correction officers over the conclusory allegations of petitioner and his inmate witnesses. Petitioner's remaining arguments have been examined and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 06, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)