Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MIKAL REALTY CO., Appellant, v. Humbert CARRERAS, et al., Respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 1921 to cancel and discharge a mortgage upon real property, the petitioner Mikal Realty Co. appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D'Emilio, J.), dated October 1, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied its petition to discharge the subject mortgage pursuant to RPAPL 1921. That statute, in relevant part, authorizes any person having an interest in a mortgage to apply for an order discharging the mortgage where the mortgagee, after the tender of all outstanding principal, interest, and other amounts due thereunder, refuses to execute a satisfaction of mortgage.
Here, however, the proof submitted by the petitioner demonstrates, inter alia, that four payments were made at least one month late. In addition, the petitioner failed to make 10 monthly payments before tendering the amount it claimed it owed. As the amount tendered failed to include interest which accrued during the petitioner's delinquency, and late fees which accrued after the respondents advised the petitioner that they were revoking the waiver of their right to demand late fees (see, RPAPL 1921[1]; Nassau Trust Co. v. Montrose Concrete Prods. Corp., 56 N.Y.2d 175, 184, 451 N.Y.S.2d 663, 436 N.E.2d 1265), the court properly denied the petition (see, RPAPL 1921[7]; Household Fin. Realty Corp. v. Delmerico, 202 A.D.2d 636, 609 N.Y.S.2d 310).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 10, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)